Let’s get mathematical for a change and talk about negative binomial
distributions (NBD) – more specifically the NBD-Dirichlet Model as developed by
Andrew Ehrenberg (Wikipedia Link Here).
The maths of this need not put you off, however, if you understand the
principles that Ehrenberg uncovered you will improve your business decision
making rapidly.
For a great introduction to this model and also to read one of the best
books on business I have ever read please track down Byron Sharp’s ‘How brands grow, what marketers don’t know.’ The following is a precis of some of the
points from Byron’s book.
The above is an idealised version of a
negative binomial distribution – I say this to mean that the percentages and
frequencies are guaranteed not to match your industry, but the principles of
this illustration are what counts. And apologies to Byron Sharp – the following
is my poor attempt to paraphrase the key principles.
First off, you can see that light buyers
represent the largest part of your buyers. In other words it is
infrequent buyers who make or break your business.
I personally think you can also apply
this to a service business too if you think of the number of purchases as
blocks of billable hours.
Secondly, you can see that improving the
loyalty of your frequent buyers won’t make that much of a difference to your
revenues.
Thirdly, targeting a particular segment
of your buyers is unlikely to make a material difference to your business. You
are better off targeting the light, medium and heavy buyers through mass
marketing.
Finally, as your market penetration
grows the binomial distribution will stay roughly the same shape, it’s just
that you earn more sales revenues. Again, this means you are better off
targeting all buyers rather than a select few.
Ever since reading this I have been
applying (and likely misapplying) this principle all over the place.
Even this blog and the user statistics
bear out the NBD-model in a crude way.
My main marketing so to speak is
LinkedIn. I post the blog on a Monday and my regular readers are on to it the
same day. However, after reading about the NBD model I realised many people may
log on to their LinkedIn account weekly if not monthly.
So given that most of us don’t go past
the first page of news on LinkedIn by Friday my blog post advertisement would
be buried by new posts somewhere on page 2 or 3 of your LinkedIn home page.
As an experiment I started reposting
(sometimes) on a Friday, and lo and behold, readership went up as I captured those
who log on on Friday and Saturday too.
To take it to the next stage, I realised
that many LinkedIn users only log on every month or so – which I see when
someone logs on and catches up on 10 or 20 postings – which happens once every
week or so. So, the next step would be to repost old blog postings regularly
(daily) as the light readers would be unlikely to have read that headline yet.
On the other hand, regular readers will become jaded, and many people would
start blocking my LinkedIn posts. However, targeting lighter readers appears
effective.
One of the key challenges I would like
you to take away from this is how you can best service light buyers.
For example, the following are a
challenge to those in the world I live in, service firms:
- Calling all law firms – while it makes sense to chase large clients which undertake a lot of complicated transactions, don’t neglect the many thousands of small and medium size businesses that only undertake a transaction every 5 to 10 years.
- Calling engineering consultants – winning major deals that employ hundreds of people for a couple of years does make sense. However, have you thought about how to win and deliver the smaller jobs for smaller clients.
- Calling bankers – winning the big deal is nice, but I bet if you added up a lot of smaller deals it would be better for your bottom line.
I have been talking to some of you out
there about this, and the most common line I am hearing against targeting
lighter buyers in the service industry is that there are too many overheads and
that it is hard to be efficient.
My counter argument to that would be to
say that if you have a large volume of customers in the light buyer category
then you are likely to make enough margin to cover the overheads.
As to the efficiency argument, my
response would be to commodify those transactions as much as possible. A lot of
service firms build themselves up around providing specific tailored solutions
to exactly match each client’s exact problems. I’ll bet a lot of customers will
be happy with ‘a solution’ as opposed to ‘the solution.’ I am sure you will
find that much of what you are doing is the same, except for the names of the
companies involved.
So, next time you are talking to someone
about their business, feel free to ask how they are affected by the NBD-model.
It’s a great party conversation.
P.S. After posting the above I was watching the cable TV show Storage Wars in which the most successful businessman said, "It was when I started selling low end items instead of just high end furniture that I turned my business around and started making a profit." It took this man 20 years to figure that out - don't wait that long.
P.S. After posting the above I was watching the cable TV show Storage Wars in which the most successful businessman said, "It was when I started selling low end items instead of just high end furniture that I turned my business around and started making a profit." It took this man 20 years to figure that out - don't wait that long.