If cash is king then efficiency is the queen.
Also known as productivity, efficiency means taking care of only what
needs to be taken care of in the most resource and time efficient manner. Every
percentage point your people are more efficient means less cost per unit of
production, which in turn means that you are more competitive, or more
profitable, or hopefully both.
Government sponsored major public-private sector efforts to improve
productivity in what then was mostly the primary (mining and agriculture) and
the secondary (manufacturing) industries.
For example, on the factory floor time and motion studies are used to
identify optimal layouts for equipment and motions for the workers. Management
and supervision are modelled on rigid hierarchy.
However, in the tertiary sector - the knowledge, software and service
industries - matters are not so straightforward. If you can work out how to accurately measure
productivity then you could make a fortune selling the idea.
There is no definitive ‘right way’ to instil efficiency as an aim in
your people, only observations. Here are a few.
Being busy doesn’t mean efficient
Many of us believe that being busy is a sign of a good worker. We admire
(consciously or subconsciously) busy people. They have a sense of energy and
achievement that others want to be part of.
However, what if the person who is busy is just a perfectionist, unable
to make timely and informed decisions?
What if they just fill their day with trivial and unimportant
activities that do little other than keep them busy?
Being orderly is a sign of efficiency, or not
A clean desk and a clean workspace with everything in their proper
place is important for efficiency isn’t it?
The answer to this is both yes and no.
There are many people who can’t concentrate if anything is out of
place. You remember them from school, they were the ones who obsessively lined
up their ruler and pencil on the desk to the nearest millimetre and would have
a meltdown if someone moved their eraser. To these people having an orderly
personal workspace is important as they can’t work properly without order.
On the other end of the spectrum are the paper collectors – you know
who I mean – the types of people with foot high stacks of paper on their desk
who know from experience roughly where everything is. If you mess with their
filing system they too will have a meltdown as they won’t know where anything
is any more.
The main problem with an overly orderly workplace is that it reeks of
inefficiency. Everything in its place means nothing is at hand when you need it
and you spend a lot of time organising rather than working.
So, let people use and abuse their personal workspace as they see fit
(subject to hygiene and safety), and enforce a general level of cleanliness for
the rest of the office. Understand that other people can work with and cope
with different levels of orderliness.
Volume versus quality
Someone who produces a high volume of work must be missing out on
quality, right?
The software industry has discovered that their most productive workers
produce 10 times as much work as their least productive, and that includes
higher quality work.
Having a thorough knowledge of your field, plus the innate curiousity
that goes with finding out about new fields of knowledge and the drive to be
more efficient are what I would be looking for if efficiency were my sole goal.
Many companies are now turning to practical tests to see whether
potential candidates can perform the job well or not. The reason for this is that in an interview
process we tend to favour the well groomed and well-spoken candidate who may in
fact be bullshitting you and maybe themselves about their ability.
Hire the best only – a bad mistake
One of the worst mistakes you can make is to build an organisation
around one or two efficiency superstars (and yes, this may include you as the
founder).
At the beginning you manage to pull off miracles on a regular basis for
your clients based on your superstars. Everyone is happy: you, the superstar
who gets to feel achievement, and your customers.
As your company grows you put on good people who do a great job and are
highly competent. However, they may need more direction and support, and they
don’t produce as much under the tight deadlines the superstars responds to.
At first your best and brightest take delight in coming in at the last
minute and saving the project.
Later, this turns to resentment as they see themselves as the only ones
who know how to get things done and they are only being paid about the same as
everyone else. If you are lucky this is the point where they quit in disgust.
If you are unlucky they will stay around and turn toxic.
So, hire a good team and recognise that they need help and support to
be efficient. Leadership and culture will be key to improving the average level
of efficiency across your organisation.
In other words, you need to bring your whole organisation on the
efficiency journey, not just rely on a few key people to average out the
inefficiency of the others.
No comments:
Post a Comment